Lightroom may technically work on older GPUs (4 to 5 years old) but likely will not benefit much.

Prefer newer GPUs (faster models within the last 3 years). The bigger the display, the bigger the win.ĥ. The GPU performance improvement in Develop is more noticeable on higher-resolution displays such as 4K. Newer GPUs and computer systems minimize this overhead.Ĥ. This may make some operations take longer, such as image-to-image switching or zooming to 1:1.

Using the GPU involves some overhead (there's no free lunch). Most (but not all) Develop controls benefit from GPU acceleration.ģ. GPU support is currently available in Develop only.Ģ. If you want to work with large databases of photographs in RAW format, you just have to swallow the shit Adobe kick out and buy Lightroom.ġ. The bottom line is this, though: there isn't really an alternative. I just wish they had done a slightly more professional job. This release has left me conflicted because all of these new things sound like good ideas and I WANT to like Lightroom. I have a nVidia GTX 780m, a very good card, and yet Lightroom is SLOWER with it enabled than without. Perhaps it can, but it doesn't seem to work with mine. Several other features feel very flaky and unpolished - like flagging and unflagging which sometimes just doesn't do anything.įinally, there's the promise that LR6 can use your graphics card. Restarting Lightroom fixes this but it is a pain.

The Crop tool in the Develop module often breaks, for me, replacing the image of the picture with a blue rectangle with white lines. Some features, like the Grid, are the same. I have never experienced one that is quite as slow as Lightroom's.)Įveryone keeps repeating Adobe's statement that LR6 is 'faster' but, in my experience, it isn't. This makes some improvements useless - for example, it doesn't matter whether the software supports modification of a graduated filter if the brush tool is too slow to use! (I've been using brush tools since Paint, and in Photoshop since Photoshop 5 on a 166 MHz Pentium. I find LR6 to be incredibly slow, even compared to LR5 which was already slow. Yes, both features are missing options and could have been done better - a lot better - but they work for the majority of cases. stitching and HDR into Lightroom was a good move and the fact that it stitches RAW files into DNG format is brilliant and unique. I read the review and also have tried out Lightroom 6.

Adobe lightroom 6 standalone